[milters] Archive

Lists Index Date Thread Search

Article: 1086
From: Anthony Howe
Date: 2006-08-05 01:57:13 -0400
Subject: Re: Milter-ClamC "450 4.7.1 anti-virus session write

Removal...........: milters-request@milter.info?subject=remove
More information..: http://www.milter.info/#Support
--------------------------------------------------------

Taylor, Grant wrote:
>> Anyway, I've recently changed this in milter-clamc for the next release:
>>
>>    !    Accept the message in the event of an clamd socket error,
>>        instead of temporaily rejecting the mail. Better to let
>>        the mail keep flowing. Sometimes clamd disappears.
> 
> Will this be an option?  We have as a company chosen that it is better 
> to TempFail email messages when we can not virus scan them.

Ugh. I'll see about it.

>> Possibly. Never thought of that. You try setting
>>
>>     clamd-max-size
>>
>> about 64KB smaller than clamd's max size and see if milter-clamc is 
>> more graceful when it knows to limit message size. Note that because 
>> of how the sendmail / milter passes date, clamd-max-size is convert 
>> into max. number of 64KB chunks rounded up. So if you specify 
>> clamd-max-size=32, it would actual do 64KB.
> 
> I'm willing to do such, but I'm not sure if that is a milter setting or 
> a clamd setting.  Will you throw me a bone please?  If not, I'll do some 
> more digging.

Well, using milter-clamc -help would show you that I was referring the 
milter option.


-- 
Anthony C Howe          Skype: SirWumpus                    SnertSoft
+33 6 11 89 73 78         AIM: SirWumpus    Sendmail Milter Solutions
http://www.snert.com/     ICQ: 7116561
     http://www.snertsoft.com/

Lists Index Date Thread Search